Development of the pragmatic meaning of everyday lexicon through telecollaboration (PRAG-ME): exploring the meaning of terms related to relational identities (TRIs)

 

The project at glance:

 

PRAG-ME Pragmatic meaning awareness development telecollaboration project 10 weeks, 2 weekly sessions
Project’s

acronym

Project’s name Duration
Objectives & Target competences Development of students’ pragma-semantic competence to enhance understanding of the current meaning of common words and to improve their interpersonal communication
Language configuration Monolingual – one language is used: English as a Lingua Franca
Target group Advanced level English learners (C1)

Sample size: Approximately 80 students

Degrees: English Studies (and studies on current social and professional communication)

Linguistic level C1 of the CEFR
Duration 10 weeks
Communication mode Synchronous and asynchronous in a blended learning environment, online and offline work, in-class, out-of-class, and between classes work
Main communication and task completion tools Mobile phone apps, Whatsapp, Google+ Communities, Google+ hangouts, Google Drive (docs, slides), video-editing software (Movie Maker, iMovie), presenting software (Prezi, PPT)
Stages of the Telecollaborative Project Stage 1 (1 week): Getting started: Becoming familiar with project and building the online community:

1.1. Introductory session

1.2. Diagnostic test

1.3. Group formation

1.4. Ice-breaking information

 

Stage 2 (2 weeks): Information search and agreement on main relational identities (RIs) and terms referred to these identities (TRIs).

2.1. Sharing personal reflexions on RIs

2.2. Reaching agreement on TRIs

2.3. Creation of joint classification

2.4. Delivery of partial results (optional)

 

Stage 3 (2 weeks): Information search and agreement on TRIs prototypes.

3.1. Search and compilation of standard definitions

3.2. Exchange and agreement on conventional definitions

3.3. Creation of joint compilation

3.4. Delivery of partial results (optional)

 

Stage 4 (2 weeks): Knowledge construction: developing pragmatic-cognitive skills:

4.1. Reflexion and description of TRIs mental models.

4.2. Exchange and agreement on TRIspragmatic definitions

4.3. Creation of joint report

4.4. Delivery of partial results (optional)

 

Stage 5 (2 weeks): Developing pragmatic knowledge in context:

5.1. Search of TRIs communicative contexts  

5.2. Exchange of data and discussion about TRIs analysis in today’s communication.

5.3. Analysis of TRIs in context and summary on results.

5.4. Delivery of partial results (optional)

 

Stage 6 (1 week): Evaluation. Presenting results and sharing experiences:

6.1. Preparation of group project

6.2. Presentation of group projects

6.3. Group discussion on the learning experience and applications of the project 

6.4. Individual evaluative report

 

Tools & Resources Mobile phone apps, Whatsapp chats, Email correspondence, Google plus community and Internet searching tools.
Assessment Individual outputs (reflections, replies, follow up information and materials provided), team work production, constructive participation, and evaluative telecollaborative artifacts (creation of final digital stories, visual displays, presentations, etc.). 

 

 

Students’ working hours
Stage 1: Getting started (80’+40’+20’)
1.1. Introductory session In class 60’
1.2. Diagnostic test Homework 40’
1.3. Group formation In class 20’
1.4. Ice-breaking information Telec. 20’
Stage 2: Information search/agreement on main RIs (30/90’+90’)
2.1. Sharing personal reflexions on RIs Homework &Telec. 30+30’
2.2. Reaching agreement on TRIs Telec. 30’
2.3. Creation of joint classification Telec. 30’
2.4. Delivery of partial results (optional) Homework 60’
Stage 3: Information search/ agreement on TRIs prototypes. (60/120’+60’)
3.1. Search and compilation of standard definitions Homework 60’
3.2. Exchange and agreement on conventional definitions Telec. 30’
3.3. Creation of joint compilation Telec. 30’
3.4. Delivery of partial results (optional) Homework 60’
Stage 4: Pragmatic meaning construction: developing pragmatic-cognitive skills (60/120’+60’)
4.1. Reflexion and description of TRIs mental models. Homework 60’
4.2. Exchange and agreement on TRIs pragmatic definitions Telec. 30’
4.3. Creation of joint report Telec. 30’
4.4. Delivery of partial results (optional) Homework 60’
Stage 5: Developing pragmatic knowledge construction(60/120’+60’)

 

5.1. Search of TRIs communicative contexts  Homework 60
5.2. Exchange of data and discussion about TRIs analysis in today’s communication. Telec. 30’
5.3. Analysis of TRIs in context and summary on results. Telec. 30’
5.4. Delivery of partial results (optional) Homework 60’
Stage 6: Evaluation. Presenting results and sharing experiences. (60/105’+15’/30+45’)
6.1. Preparation of complete group projects Homework & Telec. 45’+15’/90’+30’
6.2. Presentation of complete group projects In class 15’
6.3. Group discussion on the learning experience and applications of the project  In class 30’
6.4. Individual evaluative report Homework 15’